Upload new images. The image library for this site will open in a new window.
Upload new documents. The document library for this site will open in a new window.
Show web part zones on the page. Web parts can be added to display dynamic content such as calendars or photo galleries.
Choose between different arrangements of page sections. Page layouts can be changed even after content has been added.
Move this whole section down, swapping places with the section below it.
Check for and fix problems in the body text. Text pasted in from other sources may contain malformed HTML which the code cleaner will remove.
Accordion feature turned off, click to turn on.
Accordion featurd turned on, click to turn off.
Change the way the image is cropped for this page layout.
Cycle through size options for this image or video.
Align the media panel to the right/left in this section.
Open the image pane in this body section. Click in the image pane to select an image from the image library.
Open the video pane in this body section. Click in the video pane to embed a video. Click ? for step-by-step instructions.
Remove the image from the media panel. This does not delete the image from the library.
Remove the video from the media panel.
March 2018 University of Delaware Poll
MARCH 29, 2018—A majority of Republicans believe professional athletes
should not speak out about politics and causes, with a sizable portion saying it is
completely inappropriate for them to do so, according to a new national poll
conducted for the University of Delaware’s Center for Political Communication.
than 40% of Republicans say it is "not at all appropriate" for
professional athletes to speak out about political issues or causes, compared
to approximately 5% of Democrats. At the same time, nearly 60% of Democrats say
such speech is "very appropriate," with just over 8% of Republicans
saying so. Independents are more evenly distributed across the scale.
national poll, conducted by RABA Research, comes just weeks after conservative
FOX News host Laura Ingraham rebuked LeBron James for "talking
politics" and said, "Keep the political comments to yourselves ...
Shut up and dribble."
the Sacramento Kings
players and owner
have spoken out
publicly about the
fatal police shooting of 22-year old Stephon Clark, followed by the
joint release of a PSA with the Boston Celtics calling for "accountability."
we are witnessing is a divide in terms of how Americans think about political
speech—in particular, who gets to speak," says Dr. Dannagal Young,
Associate Professor of Communication at the University of Delaware.
Move this whole section up, swapping places with the section above it.
this divide stems from the fact that celebrities and athletes tend to speak out
for liberal causes. In addition, liberals have a history of political
expression in non-political realms dating back to the music, art, and activism
of the 1960s counterculture. Hence, it is unsurprising that we find more
support for celebrity political expression among Democrats than
are further exemplified in responses to the prompt, "Professional athletes
are paid to play the game, not share their political opinion." While
nearly 25% of Democrats agreed with this statement, a majority — 79% —
of Republicans agreed.
Respondents were also asked whether such speech constitutes First Amendment rights when celebrities speak out about politics. Among Democrats, 57% strongly agreed and 30% agreed with the statement, "When celebrities speak out about politics, they are exercising their First Amendment rights." Among Republicans, nearly 18% strongly agreed and 51% agreed with the same statement.
“What’s most striking is not comparing how Americans across the ideological spectrum agree versus disagree with the statement, but how extreme the differences are between Democrats and Republicans in ‘agree’ and ‘strongly agree,’” said Dr. Lindsay Hoffman, Associate Director of the Center for Political Communication. "For many years, Americans have been largely supportive of the First Amendment, even in some of the most politically contentious years, like 2017, according to the First Amendment Center at the Newseum. Yet even our Supreme Court Justices are often blinded by their ideology when it comes to supporting the First Amendment in cases that oppose their point of view. Political scientists Lee Epstein, Jeffrey Segal, and Christopher Parker concluded that many Supreme Court Justices’ votes in free speech cases are opportunistic and strongly correlated to the ideology of the speech or the speaker. Our poll suggests that support for celebrities tends to be much greater among Democrats than Republicans, perhaps as a result of outspoken celebrities who have recently taken on more liberal causes."
Interviews of 607 American adults were conducted March 21-22, 2018, via online interviews. The results were weighted to ensure a proportional response. The margin of error for these results is +/-4.1%. Party ID was re-coded to three categories for graphic purposes (Democrats = 298; Independents = 127; and Republicans = 182). For questions on methodology, please email: firstname.lastname@example.org or call 917-685-4819. The National Agenda Opinion Project research is funded by the University of Delaware's nonpartisan Center for Political Communication (CPC). The study was supervised by the CPC's Associate Director, Lindsay Hoffman (Associate Professor), Dannagal Young (Associate Professor), and Phil Jones (Associate Professor) in the Departments of Communication and Political Science & International Relations.